“We Just Didn’t Execute Properly”: Evans’ disappointment in London

Jamie Cooper Avatar

Evans’ disappointment in London stemmed from strategic missteps despite having a fast car. Despite finishing second, energy management issues cost him a shot at victory in the crucial penultimate race.

Mitch Evans from Jaguar TCS Racing faced a mixed day at the first leg of the 2024 Hankook London E-Prix season finale doubleheader. Despite a strong performance that kept him in contention for the championship, Evans had to settle for second place behind Pascal Wehrlein of TAG Heuer Porsche. This result, while reducing the points gap to the championship leader, left Evans reflecting on what could have been a victory.

Evans’ disappointment in London despite strong performance

Mitch Evans started the race from a promising position, aiming to capitalise on his pace and secure a win. However, the race did not unfold as he had hoped. Reflecting on his performance, Evans expressed his disappointment, saying, “Yeah, disappointing.”

“I think we had the car and the pace to win today. We just didn’t execute properly. The approach was wrong from our side and yeah, the energy deficit killed me in the end.”

Evans acknowledged that while the car’s pace was there, the team’s approach to the race strategy and energy management fell short. This shortcoming ultimately prevented him from securing the top spot on the podium.

Strategic missteps

The Jaguar driver identified energy management as a critical issue that affected his performance. Unlike Wehrlein, who managed his energy efficiently and timed his Attack Mode activations perfectly, Evans found himself disadvantaged. He explained, “No, just in terms of how we approach the race, in terms of how you want to attack it in the first phase. And then the energy deficit to Pascal and Max [Günther] for his issue was quite big and that was what made the difference in the end.”

This energy deficit turned out to be a significant factor, with Evans noting that it was a matter of execution rather than the car’s inherent efficiency. The failure to manage energy effectively in the crucial phases of the race left him unable to mount a challenge for the lead in the closing stages.

Lessons for the final showdown

Looking ahead to the second race of the doubleheader, Evans remained optimistic about his chances but acknowledged the need for better execution. “The race tomorrow is a bit different in terms of length. So that does change a bit. It puts even more emphasis on qualifying,” he noted. Evans emphasised the importance of starting towards the front and refining their strategy to ensure a stronger performance.

He also recognised the need to learn from the day’s experiences, stating, “We just have to make sure our car is quick over one lap again, like today. And then, yeah, just learn from today.”

And then if we can start towards the front tomorrow, just do a better job at executing and just how we kind of approach it and how we optimise the strategy in the race.”

Evans says the “battles” were “all really clean”

While the front-runners experienced a relatively clean race, the rest of the grid was not as fortunate, with multiple incidents and collisions. Evans, however, maintained his focus on the front, engaging in clean battles with Wehrlein and Sebastian Buemi of Envision Racing. “There’s some good battles between all three of us throughout the race, but it was all really clean,” Evans remarked.

Mitch Evans’ second-place finish at the London E-Prix, while a strong result, left him contemplating what might have been. The championship battle remains tight, and with Evans just a few points behind Wehrlein, the stage is set for an exciting finale.

Featured Image Credit: Formula E | Sam Bagnall